Barb, a shoe salesperson, follows Ken, another shoe salesperson, as he makes his rounds. Barb solicits the business of every customer approached by Ken. Barb would probably be liable for wrongful interference with
a. a business relationship.
b. a contractual relationship.
c. a customer relationship.
d. none of the above.
a. a business relationship.
b. a contractual relationship.
c. a customer relationship.
d. none of the above.
a. a business relationship.
Begründung:
1. There was a established business relationship.
2. The tortfeasor, by use of predatory methods, intentionally caused this business relationship to end.
3. The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the tortfeasor's actions.
Begründung:
1. There was a established business relationship.
2. The tortfeasor, by use of predatory methods, intentionally caused this business relationship to end.
3. The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the tortfeasor's actions.
Tags: Wrongful interference with a business relationship
Quelle: p. 31
Quelle: p. 31
Acme Computers, a computer store, takes unethical steps to divert the customers of Cyber Goods, an adjacent competing store. Acme may be liable for
a. appropriation.
b. wrongful interference with a business relationship.
c. wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
d. none of the above.
a. appropriation.
b. wrongful interference with a business relationship.
c. wrongful interference with a contractual relationship.
d. none of the above.
b. wrongful interference with a business relationship.
Begründung:
1. There was an established business relationship.
2. The tortfeasor, by use of predatory methods, intentionally caused this business relationship to end.
3. The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the tortfeasor's actions.
Begründung:
1. There was an established business relationship.
2. The tortfeasor, by use of predatory methods, intentionally caused this business relationship to end.
3. The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the tortfeasor's actions.
Tags: Wrongful interference with a business relationship
Quelle: p. 31
Quelle: p. 31
Kartensatzinfo:
Autor: Elisa
Oberthema: Law
Thema: International Law
Schule / Uni: Hanze Hogeschool
Ort: Groningen
Veröffentlicht: 14.02.2010
Tags: Exam Year 1
Schlagwörter Karten:
Alle Karten (125)
? (1)
2nd Absatz (2)
Business Trust (2)
Conversion (1)
Defamation (1)
Dissolution LP (1)
Distributorship (2)
Domestic (1)
First sentence (2)
Franchise (1)
Joint venture (2)
last sentence (1)
LLC (1)
Negligence (1)
Partnerships (1)
point 2 (1)
Preferred Stock (1)
Preferred stocks (1)
Self-defense (1)
Slander of Title (1)
Stocks (3)
Syndicate (2)
Trespass to Land (1)
Wrongful interference with a business relationship (2)
